Home

Previous 20

Jul. 18th, 2008


[info]sunfell

Facebook still tracks you

This is alarming:

Logged in or out, Facebook is watching you

Responding to privacy concerns, Facebook has since moved to reassure users that it only tracks and publishes data about their purchases if they are both logged in to Facebook and have opted-in to having this information listed on their profile.

But in "extremely disconcerting" findings that directly contradict these assurances, researchers at CA's Security Advisory service have found that data about these transactions are sent to Facebook regardless of a user's actions.

Tests by CA researcher Stefan Berteau, published here, seem to prove the point.

During the test, Berteau executed actions (saved a recipe) on Facebook affiliate site epicurious.com three times.

In the first instance, he saved a recipe while still logged in to Facebook.

"An alert appeared allowing me to opt-out of Facebook's publishing this as a story on my feed, which I did," he said.

He then saved a recipe on Epicurious.com with the Facebook window closed, but while he was still logged in to Facebook. Again he was alerted, and this time chose "No, thanks" -- and therefore opting out of the service.

He then saved a third recipe while he was completely logged out of the Facebook site under a new browser session, and received no alert.

Berteau then consulted CA's network traffic logs, and found that in all three cases, data (such as his Facebook account name and details of his actions on the affiliate site) had been submitted to Facebook.

Berteau claims the results of the tests prove that Facebook is able to collect information about its members' surfing habits on affiliate sites, regardless of whether permission has been granted.


And people wonder why I don't have a Facebook. Also LJ uses similar tracking bugs- so I log out and flush out the cache before I go anywhere sensitive.

[info]voxwoman

Audacious Eleven Celebrates Show #11 with the 11:11 Listener Drive!

 
The #1 Talk Show for Shakespearean Rock 'n' Roll Tech Geek Magic and Life Empowerment will post its 11th show on Sunday, July 20th.  To celebrate this mystical milestone, Audacious Donna, Mary, Robin, and Wendy are holding a contest - The 11:11 Listener Drive! 

 

Our wordy tagline points to the fact that you never know what you'll hear on Audacious Eleven, and it's time for even more people out there to hear it. Will all you loyal and newly intrigued listeners help us out?  Here's the deal:

 

Tell all your clever, interesting, hip, and/or bored friends to do two little things:

 

1.      Go to www.audaciouseleven.com and listen to at least one Audacious Eleven podcast.

2.      Become a friend of Audacious Eleven on MySpace at www.myspace.com/audaciouseleven.  (If your friends are particularly expedient or lazy, they can access our shows right on MySpace via our blog.)  When they friend us, they need to let us know you sent them.  That way, we can keep score.

 

The first 11 people to send 11 of their friends our way will win one of 11 fabulous prizes!  Prizes include the chance to pick an Audacious Eleven discussion topic, your very own cartoon avatar a la Audacious Eleven, never-before-heard outtakes from the show, CDs, and curios from the homes of the four audacious women who are Audacious Eleven, and more.  We won't tell you what the "more" consists of yet, but rest assured, those prizes are fabulous, too.

 

So have at it.  Thanks for playing!

 

Love,

 

Audacious Eleven


[info]sunfell

"Cloud"-based computing

Any opinions, experience, thoughts about so-called 'cloud' computing? This includes stuff like Microsoft's Office Live Workspace, Apple's "Mobile Me", etc. Are there others besides these? "Mobile Me" seems to be the most feature-rich, but is $99 a year. Are there any similar things that are free?

I really need to create an online stash-spot- or several. Right now, I have stuff scattered here and there- mostly on Microsoft sites, but if Mobile Me is that good, I might consider it.

Time to do some research!

[info]sunfell

Lessons of love

This is even better than Maureen Dowd's quotes of last week:

Lessons in Love, by Way of Economics

Here are a couple of his thoughts:

High-quality bonds consistently yield more return than junk, and so it is with high-quality love. As for the returns on bonds, I know that my comment will come as a surprise to people who have been brainwashed into thinking that junk bonds are free money. They aren’t. The data from the maven of bond research, W. Braddock Hickman, shows that junk debt outperforms high quality only in rare situations, because of the default risk.

In love, the data is even clearer. Stay with high-quality human beings. And once you find that you are in a junk relationship, sell immediately. Junk situations can look appealing and seductive, but junk is junk. Be wary of it unless you control the market.

(Or, as I like to tell college students, the absolutely surest way to ruin your life is to have a relationship with someone with many serious problems, and to think that you can change this person.)



Research pays off. The most appealing and seductive (that word again) exterior can hide the most danger and chance of loss. For most of us, diversification in love, at least beyond a very small number, is impossible, so it’s necessary to do a lot of research on the choice you make. It is a rare man or woman who can resist the outward and the surface. But exteriors can hide far too much.


Enjoy!

Jul. 17th, 2008


[info]voxwoman

Free MIT and My Summer Houseguest

I just found out, from one of my writer's lists, that MIT offers some of their courses online for free. I'm amazed and excited about that, and I've already downloaded a programming class' lectures for my iPod. I'm also going to check out Street-Fighting Mathematics.

In other news, [info]nolawitch will be here at my house in less than24 hours! Squee! I'm going to let her drag me into Manhattan, to see the Dali exhibit at the Museum of Modern Art. I think the house is presentable, but R is concerned about the floors, so he's going to do something about them in the afternoon.

I meant to get a podcast or 2 done tonight, but I didn't feel like it. Oh well...

[info]owlsforodin

Thor's Day

 

I love pathology....NOT! Students and coworkers will be frustrating, and sometimes it's more about them than you. Stewing over it two hours later over lunch...that's on me and no one else. And the early part of the week opened so well.


After work, life went better. I bought new shoes and a couple pairs of pants. The significance of that? I've the extra money to spend for the first time since Christmas. Now for some wargaming stuff!



[info]sunfell

I'd vote for this guy

[info]lihan161051 found this wonderful campaign website:

Running for office, XKCD style

I'd vote for this guy in a heartbeat. But since I'm not one of his constituents, I can't. Gotta admire a geeky guy who wants to 'retire' his State Representative- and in Kansas yet! I think I might send a few bucks his way- just for giving me a smile this afternoon.

ETA: He's just updated his site, and he has exceeded the number of donors he needed- and it's still climbing! That's great!

[info]sunfell

Vegetarian Times

I got a really good offer for a subscription to Vegetarian Times that I might just take, simply because 2 years for $11 is too good to pass up. And I noted that it has stuff for everyone from vegans to flexitarians. I guess I'd be a flexitarian, because I do like meat- just not in huge quantities. As I've said before, huge servings would be for 'feast' occasions, and it would be a condiment the rest of the time.

But I think about what my favorite foods are, and most of them are vegetables of one sort or another, complimented with little bits of meat, seafood, or chicken. I just ate some of my carmelized onions- probably one of the most delicious things I've made in a while. That is going to be a regular item on my menu. They're so easy to make, and taste so good, that not making them would be almost criminal.

But it is gratifying that 90% of my favorite foods are veggies- everything from broccoli to cabbage to rutabagas, and tomatoes, carrots, spuds, mushrooms of various sorts (love shiitake!), nuts, some grains, rice, and noodles. I also enjoy good cheeses, and eggs and could probably coast along for quite a while until being overwhelmed by a craving for shrimp or something.

It's that moderation thing- I don't have to chew through a hand-sized slab of meat to feel like I've been fed- a fraction of that serving, properly seasoned and cooked, would satisfy me just as much- if not more.

I think I'll send off for the magazine. The satay noodle recipe they sent with the offer sure looked good- I need to find myself some garlic chili paste.

[info]poltr1

It's done.

All of Jack and Suzanne's stuff has been moved out of their old house and into their new house a few blocks away. Now I can rest my body for a few days. And think about the amount of stuff I'd have to move when it comes time to move out of the condo. At least most of it's in boxes.

[info]amethyst_hunter in [info]dark_christian

Another ray of sunshiney goodness

Illinois suburb library tells censor-happy dommies to have a nice warm cup of STFU.

To sum up: A group of roughly 5 or less families - which oh-so-conveniently happen to be affiliated with the same anti-choice dominionist-friendly organization that is hellbent on running out of town the new Planned Parenthood that opened in Aurora last year - complained about a local library that permitted its teenaged patrons to access the PP Teenwire website on its computers. Well, the library handed down its decision today, and the verdict is that Teenwire stays (albeit relocated under a different reference section).

Yay for common sense!

[info]kisekileia in [info]dark_christian

A ray of sunshine

One librarian's response to a challenge to a children's book on gay marriage. Although dominionism is not explicitly mentioned anywhere, the letter is probably the most lucid refutation of the dominionist arguments for censorship in the U.S. that I have read.

[info]shalowater in [info]the_recipe_bowl

bases // yellow & fruit

image heavy post with two tables
preview


- these are bases, you may alter them
- i'd love suggestions on icon themes
- ask me about requests & interest icons
- no hotlinking, please credit
- resources | bases | icons | textures

here @ [info]shalowater

Jul. 16th, 2008


[info]sunfell

A happier post

OK, that was a bit of a rant- a Citizen's Rant, if you will. But I had to say something.

Here's something that is more pleasant to contemplate:

Bartering Expands in the Internet Age

Barter is a neat idea- do you have a barterable skill?

And I don't know whether or not to laugh, or be squicked out by this one:

Frantic Rescue Effort Saves Doll, not Baby

Those things look too real, apparently. And who buys those things... no, I don't want to know.

I never went to summer camp. Did you?

[info]sunfell

Yeah, this is very bad...

HHS Moves to define contraception as abortion

Folks- this is bad. Seriously, incredibly, almost stunningly bad. It demonstrates a level of scientific incompetence only seen in certain religious circles, and it doesn't take a genius to figure out who is behind this.

Here is the telling paragraph:

Up until now, the federal government followed the definition of pregnancy accepted by the American Medical Association and our nation's pregnancy experts, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, which is: pregnancy begins at implantation. With this proposal, however, HHS is dismissing medical experts and opting instead to accept a definition of pregnancy based on polling data. It now claims that pregnancy begins at some biologically unknowable moment (there's no test to determine if a woman's egg has been fertilized). Under these new standards there would be no way for a woman to prove she's not pregnant. Thus, any woman could be denied contraception under HHS' new science.


The real irony with all the abortion back-and-forth is that the religious people who are forcing this upon us are ignoring their precious Bronze-age document and what it says about abortion: which is nothing. In fact, it only says that life begins at birth- when the child draws its first breath, because God breathed life into the bodies of his creations. Until then, the child is not a person- and in fact, there are even passages that talk about forcing miscarriages in the Old Testament. Of course, those are ignored- as are any passages in Scripture that might be inconvenient to their arguement, and their goal of pretty much making women slaves to their biology.

I took the Pill for years to regulate my cycles and keep my endometriosis at a manageable level. And other women take it for similar reasons. But many take it to manage their own family sizes, or to prevent pregnancy. Pregnancy is not a walk in the park, and for some of us, it is a death sentence. Removing that safety barrier will send a lot of women to doctors for more permanent solutions. Will those be outlawed, too?

What really bothers me is how all this anti-contraception, rights-reducing chipping away is so counter-intuitive. Our population is exploding- in spite of all the 'empty cradle' wailing that is going on. This country is replacing itself just fine. We're the only Western country that is exceeding its replacement rate. But I think that the edge is getting near- we've exploited nearly every arable acre and patch of dirt on this planet, our oceans have become toilets, and our aquifers are being sucked dry even as heating from all our exhalations and activities is growing, shrinking the places we do have to live.

The idea of limitless conception in the light of what is happening to us in the long run is reprehensible, and shows a lack of vision and compassion in those who would force this upon us- and upon countries they've dominated. Their real reason for all of this willy-nilly birthing isn't enslaving women- although that is part of it- women are not people in their eyes. (That cherry-picked Scripture of theirs says so!) No, it's hastening the return of Jesus: once the world is turned into a giant toxic landfill crawling with diseased, starving, genetically deformed and debased people (believers all!), Jesus will come and scoop the entire lot up, like some sort of cosmic "Wall-E" and tote them all up to heaven, leaving the 'un-saved' to rot with the planet.

How charmingly compassionate. This mindset is why we are worse off now than we were 7 years ago, and why we're seeing our rights slipping away like eels through our hands. It why the US is now the least-admired country in the world, and why a match is being waved at the powder keg that is the Islamic world. And this mindset is why our leadership in science and engineering is going to hell- when our kids are not taught proper biology, they cannot compete with other countries who have no compunction of understanding what is and is not a proper theory.

What can we do? We can let HHS know that this is not a good idea. We can tell our Congressmen and women that this is not a good idea. We can get doctors and lawyers to rip it apart, and we can hope that more rational minds will rescue our government from the clutches of the politico-religious junta that has stolen the seats of power, and restore it to some semblance of balance. There is room for religious belief, but religious belief should never, ever dictate health (or government) policies. That is where we need to put the stick in.

I know that some of my esteemed colleagues here on LJ have written some pretty amazing screeds (heads in beehives, anyone?) screaming in rage about this- but I prefer a more rational tack: Direct that rage into Getting Something Done TO CHANGE THE POLICY. Instead of inchoate screaming, use that anger to light a fire under your butts- male and female (because, guys, you're tangled in this too- it isn't a 'girl thing'- you might be forced into 18+ years of indentured servitude against your will!)- and change things!

It is clear that the religious forces behind this have no shame, no humility, and a hell of a lot of hubris, and power is on their side. We need to deprive them of that power. We need to take them out of power and shove them back into the dark corners they crawled out of. We can let them inflict their beliefs on their own people, but not on the rest of us. That is the key: find these people, and de-fang them. Send them packing. Sue them, fire them, find some nasty little secret (sexual, most likely), empty their coffers, and run them out of power.

That is what we can do. No torch-bearing mobs, no screaming in the streets. Just determined, goal-oriented action. It is how these people got into power. Get off your complacent butts and take their jobs, people, get into the school-boards, the grass-roots, the town councils, the local and state governments, and kick them out! Kansas did it, and so did Pennsylvania.

THAT is why we're America. We can learn from our mistakes. Let's learn from this one and reclaim our country, or we'll lose it to a bunch of people who believe that Bronze-age tribal religions are a good thing.

[info]voxwoman

sic sic sic

Tags:

[info]sunfell

Simon's Cat has a new episode!


[info]lyght in [info]dark_christian

HHS moves to define contraception as "abortion"

There is apparently a proposal in the wings by Health and Human Services to kowtow to the religious right's desire to count the pill, the patch, IUDs, etc. as "abortion" because they *might* prevent implantation of a fertilized egg.

Just to be clear, this potentially would affect any organization that takes government grant money. Suddenly it would be up to them (for now) as to whether they felt like offering such medical services or not. If the legal status of abortion changed, though, they could conceivably be barred from offering such services.

I was alerted to this development by a friend of mine...his sources were Reproductive Health Reality Check (which links to the "leaked document") and feministing.com.

*sigh*

[info]ingridsummers

Remembering

This morning I was reminded in a journey that even if the situation isn't "perfect" or even "ideal", I still need to step up and do what I can. I was reminded of what happens when a person does not pick up their power.

It is easy for me to forget that I am a person of power. It's easy for me to get lost in the daily grind of work, housework and motherhood. It's easy because I get distracted and don't make the connections I know I should, or do the journeys, or write or whatever.

Yet, at any moment I can step into whatever "work" there is for me. Or, perhaps "work" is the wrong word. Perhaps "power" is better. At any moment I can step into my power and be a force in my life and my world.

[info]poltr1

Been busy....

...helping two non-LJ friends in Middletown move out of their house, in which they've lived for 36 years. Helped out for 8 hours on Saturday, all day Monday (yesterday), and all day Tuesday (today). They need to have everything out of the house by noon Wednesday. Lots of stuff got thrown out, lots of stuff got packed and loaded in the U-Haul truck, and a few things ended out at the curb (which were picked up promptly by people driving by).

My body's tired, but I'm going back for more.

Jul. 15th, 2008


[info]sunfell

Lovely handwriting sample


P7150017
Originally uploaded by Sunfell
This is a close-up of a photograph of plans for WPA cabins at a state park. I really like the lovely little serifs and original style of this label.

Previous 20